Sandstone Logo

From Intake to Insight: How AI Agents Turn Legal Requests Into Scalable Operations

For many in-house teams, 30–50% of counsel time disappears into intake, triage, and status chasing—not analysis or negotiation. The work is important; the way it happens isn’t. Email threads, DM pings, and scattered links bury context and break accountability. The opportunity is to turn the front door of legal into an operating system where each request enriches your playbooks, not your inbox.

The Hidden Bottleneck Is Intake, Not Review

Legal leaders often optimize templates and approval matrices while the true drag happens upstream. Unstructured intake forces counsel to reconstruct facts, chase the right approver, and guess priority. That creates rework, slows cycle time, and erodes trust with sales, procurement, and product.

A structured, AI-assisted front door changes the math. Instead of human-led sorting, an agent collects key facts, applies policy, drafts a first pass (when safe), and routes with clear SLAs. Every decision and exception feeds back into the knowledge layer so the system gets faster and more precise over time.

What AI Agent–Led Intake Actually Looks Like

Ground this in everyday workflows:

- NDAs: An agent checks counterparty details, selects the right template (mutual vs. one-way), applies fallback positions, and returns a signed-ready draft—or escalates if redlines touch a sensitive clause.

- Vendor reviews: Intake captures data processing scope, jurisdiction, and security posture. The agent triggers the right playbook (DPA, SCCs), assembles the packet, and requests approvals from privacy and security based on thresholds.

- Sales redlines: The agent compares markups to playbook tolerances, applies preapproved edits, and produces an issues list for counsel when exceptions cross risk thresholds.

On Sandstone, these agents sit on top of your playbooks, prior decisions, and systems of record. They pull context from CRM, procurement, and policy wikis; they log actions, produce rationale, and hand off to humans with a complete audit trail. Natural integration, not forced change management.

Metrics That Prove It’s Working

If you can’t measure it, you can’t scale it. Start with:

- Median and P90 cycle time by request type

- Auto-resolution rate (no human touch) and human-in-the-loop coverage

- First-contact SLA adherence (acknowledge and path set)

- Exception rate by clause/playbook rule (and top drivers)

- Playbook application rate (how often the agent used a policy as-is)

- Requester satisfaction (quick pulse via 2–3 questions)

A healthy agent-led intake should lift auto-resolution on NDAs and low-risk asks to 50–80%, cut time-to-first-response to minutes, and reduce legal touches per request. The side effect: cleaner data and repeatable insights for quarterly planning.

A 30-Day Implementation Playbook

You don’t need a moonshot to get lift. Ship value in weeks:

- Week 1 — Map demand and normalize intake:

- Identify the top 3 request types by volume (e.g., NDA, marketing review, vendor DPA).

- Define a 5–7 field intake form per type (counterparty, use case, jurisdiction, data sensitivity, deadline).

- Baseline current cycle times and touches.

- Week 2 — Encode policy and connect systems:

- Translate playbooks into decision rules and clause tolerances.

- Integrate with CRM/procurement for enrichment; set up identity/SSO.

- Establish human-in-the-loop checkpoints and escalation paths.

- Week 3 — Pilot in one business unit:

- Route all new NDAs through the agent. Track auto-resolution, exceptions, and SLA adherence.

- Collect requester feedback; refine prompts and thresholds.

- Week 4 — Expand and operationalize:

- Add a second workflow (e.g., vendor DPAs) and approvals.

- Publish working agreements (SLA, responsibilities) and train stakeholders.

- Review metrics; set quarterly targets and a backlog for playbook gaps.

Sandstone’s layered architecture makes this incremental: start with one workflow, let every decision strengthen the foundation, and compound from there.

Guardrails, Governance, and Trust

Speed without trust is a liability. Bake in:

- Data boundaries: Keep sensitive docs in your tenant; log access; redact PII in prompts where appropriate.

- Version control and approvals: Every clause change is traceable. Exceptions require named approvers.

- Policy provenance: Agents cite the playbook rule behind each action; counsel can override with rationale captured.

- Controls and compliance: SOC 2–aligned processes, DLP, retention policies, and jurisdiction-aware handling (e.g., SCC selection).

These guardrails turn AI from a novelty into dependable infrastructure for legal and the business.

Actionable Next Step

Run a two-week intake audit. Categorize the last 100 requests by type, risk, cycle time, and touches. Pick one high-volume, low-risk workflow (often NDAs) and pilot an agent-led path with a simple intake form, a narrow playbook, and clear SLAs. Measure auto-resolution and P90 cycle time before/after—then decide where to expand.

A streamlined, AI-powered intake is more than a convenience; it’s the foundation for scalable legal operations. When every request enriches your playbooks and every decision is captured, legal stops being a bottleneck and becomes the connective tissue of the business. That’s the philosophy behind Sandstone: layered data, modular workflows, and natural integration that turns knowledge into action—and action into trust and growth.